Evidence of flight safety lapses is staggering, reveals Aircraft Engineers International


VALETTA, Malta, 13 Nov. 2012. Aircraft Engineers International (AEI) officials, addressing licensed aircraft maintenance engineers at the 40th AEI Annual Congress, characterized the amount of evidence detailing safety lapses by both commercial operators and aviation regulators as “staggering.”

Recent International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) safety audit results indicate a 60 percent average rate of compliance with regulations, whereas national aviation safety regulator manning levels average roughly 24 percent of the target. 

"These facts explain why regulatory authorities consistently fail to uncover, let alone correct, serious safety lapses," says AEI Secretary General Fred Bruggeman of the ICAO safety audit figures. "It is not possible for industry regulators to oversee a safety-critical industry without being properly resourced."

Licensed aircraft maintenance engineers are responsible for certifying that an aircraft is in a condition for safe operation. They are licensed independently of the airlines by national aviation authorities rather than by the airlines, which should ensure maintenance activities are performed in the correct manner, to the highest standards and that safety is not compromised. The naming of licensed personnel with authority to release aircraft into service by signature is an accepted method of accountability that applies worldwide, an AEI spokesperson explains.

Aircraft maintenance is an area of high potential danger and critical to safe flight operations; nonetheless, those who “take their safety responsibilities seriously are often deemed by airlines to be a problem and all too often a simple logic prevails: shoot the messenger and you remove the problem,” the spokesperson adds.

"Pressure on aircraft engineers to overlook safety issues has been steadily increasing as the priority for airlines shifts from safety to profit,” admits AEI President Robert Alway. “Regulators need to do more to protect aircraft engineers who report safety problems. After all, their actions could well prevent an accident and that is most certainly in the public interest."

Follow Avionics Intelligence news updates on Twitter (@Avionics_Intel), LinkedIn, and Google+.

Image courtesy Shutterstock.

aircraft engineer

Get the Intelligent Inbox Bi-weekly Newsletter Delivered to Your Inbox

Subscribe to email newsletter today at no cost and receive the latest information on:

  • Comercial Aviation
  • Avionics

Press Releases


Curtiss-Wright Corporation today announced that its Defense Solutions division has received a contract...

Innovative Integration Announces the FMC-Servo

Camarillo, CA June 19, 2015, Innovative Integration, a trusted supplier of signal processing and data ...


Curtiss-Wright Corporation today announced that its Defense Solutions division has further enhanced it...

Related Products

General Micro "Horizon" C299

The C299 Horizon is a third generation, 6U cPCI SBC module based on GMS’ upgradable CPU...

General Micro "Atom" XPC40X Rugged, Ultra-Small, Ultra-Low-Power Intel Atom™ CPU SBC

The XPC40X Atom is a rugged, low cost, ultra-low power, lightweight, Atom™ based comput...

General Micro's VS295 Eclipse

The VS295 Eclipse is fifth generation, VME SBC module based on GMS, upgradable CPU tech...

Related Companies

Innovative Integration

  Since 1988, Innovative Integration has grown to become one of the world's leading supplier...

General Micro Systems Inc

Since 1979, General Micro Systems has been providing the most diverse line of single-board comput...

Elma Electronic Inc

Who we are...   About Elma Electronic Systems   The Systems division of Elma Electron...

Latest from the Paris Air Show

Most Popular Articles

All Access Sponsors

Follow Us On...